EGOR KHVOSTOV

Egor Khvostov

Egor Khvostov

Egor Khvostov

Download CV (PDF)

Egor Khvostov is a photographer and visual artist, working in the field of critical fine art photography. His practice draws on critical theory, social and political research, and history, treating photography as a tool for producing knowledge at the intersection of visual art and the social sciences. His projects examine the institutional mechanisms that administer time: which memories are kept and which are not, whose future arrives and whose remains nostalgia for something that never happened. Such mechanisms cannot be observed directly. They do, however, leave material residue — premises, regulations, dates, fences, awards — and it is this residue that can be photographed. An academic background in history, socio-political theory and philosophy, with a BA from Moscow Pedagogical State University and an MA from the University of Manchester, determines the sequence of the work: analysis first, camera afterwards. Photographic training: a certificate in Authorial Style in Photography from the Rodchenko Art School, Moscow, under Igor Mukhin. The unit of statement is the series rather than the frame. Meaning is produced by the relations between images, not by a single successful photograph. Black and white remains the principal solution but not the only one: the medium follows the requirements of the series rather than convention.

Critical Fine Art Photography

The work is structured as research carried through to an image. Socio-political analysis establishes a discrepancy — a point where two official accounts fail to agree, or where a physical trace remains that no procedure anticipated. The discrepancy is verified against documents, dates and counts. Only then does the camera enter, and its task is to present what has been established. A discrepancy is not a secret. It lies in plain view, in published documents and ordinary formulations, and requires attention rather than access. The work aims at a statement tied to a place, a date and a document, and capable of being wrong. This is a condition rather than a claim: if no circumstances can be imagined under which the statement would prove false, then nothing definite has been said. A separate condition concerns those who appear in the frame. The person photographed is treated as a party to the work rather than its content, and the question of what the work does to them is asked before the shutter is released.

New Story Mode

Story mode is a term from the video game industry: a narrative path in which the player makes hundreds of decisions while the ending is written in advance. It is chosen not under compulsion but because it always makes clear what to do next. The script that prescribes official forms of memory, identity and the future works the same way. The difference is that a game has authors and this script has none: it was assembled without coordination, by different hands at different times, and is the more durable for it. Every assembly has seams. New Story Mode is a method for exposing them — not an exit from the script, since none exists, but the restoration of a thing to the status of a decision, one with a date, a cause and someone who made it. The method promises no outcome. What a work will produce, on whom it will act and when, cannot be established; what can be promised is the reproducibility of the procedure itself.